style(list): render list rows as a dense table, not floating cards - #109
Merged
Conversation
This was referenced Aug 3, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Follow-up to the column-alignment fix (#107). The columns lined up, but each row was still a floating card (border + shadow + 8px gaps) — the board-card aesthetic, which is why the list didn't read as a table.
Asana's list view is a dense, ruled table: rows sit flush with hairline dividers and a hover highlight. This makes the List rows look the part.
What changed (CSS only, scoped to
li.list-row)border-bottom), tighter8px 14pxpadding, and a:hoverbackground highlight..list-section__rows: zeroed the inter-row gap so each row's bottom rule butts against the next into one continuous table (the sortable header row supplies the top rule)..task-cardwithout.list-row, so they're untouched.No schema, no logic. The existing list e2e (including the Assignee-header-aligns-with-cells guard from #107) still passes.